自動化式侵害及び攻撃シミュレーションの世界市場予測（～2024年）...市場調査レポートについてご紹介

1 Introduction (Page No. – 13)
1.1 Objectives of the Study
1.2 Market Definition
1.3 Market Scope
1.3.1 Market Segmentation
1.3.2 Regional Scope
1.4 Years Considered for the Study
1.5 Currency Considered
1.6 Stakeholders
2 Research Methodology (Page No. – 16)
2.1 Research Data
2.1.1 Secondary Data
2.1.2 Primary Data
2.1.2.1 Breakup of Primaries
2.1.2.2 Key Industry Insights
2.2 Market Breakup and Data Triangulation
2.3 Market Size Estimation
2.3.1 Top-Down Approach
2.3.2 Bottom-Up Approach
2.4 Market Forecast
2.5 Assumptions for the Study
2.6 Limitations of the Study
3 Executive Summary (Page No. – 23)
4 Premium Insights (Page No. – 26)
4.1 Attractive Opportunities in the Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Market
4.2 Market By Offering, 2019–2024
4.3 Market By Service, 2019–2024
4.4 Market By Application, 2019–2024
4.5 Market By Region, 2019–2024
5 Market Overview and Industry Trends (Page No. – 29)
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Market Dynamics
5.2.1 Drivers
5.2.1.1 Complexity in Managing Vulnerabilities From Various Sources
5.2.1.2 Demand for Prioritizing Security Investments
5.2.1.3 Need to Manage Regulations and Compliances
5.2.2 Restraints
5.2.2.1 Highly Crowded Security Industry
5.2.3 Opportunities
5.2.3.1 Growing Business Sizes Making Manual Testing Complex
5.2.4 Challenges
5.2.4.1 Dearth of Cybersecurity Professionals
5.2.4.2 Low Awareness About Cybersecurity
5.3 Use Cases
6 Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Market By Offering (Page No. – 34)
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Platforms/Tools
6.2.1 Need for Continuous Assessment of Security Hygiene to Drive the Demand for ABAS Platforms/Tools
6.3 Services
6.3.1 Training
6.3.1.1 Need for Continuous Skill Assessment and Training to Understand the Complexities of Rapidly Evolving Security Posture to Drive the ABAS Market
6.3.2 On-Demand Analyst
6.3.2.1 Inadequate In-House Skills to Map or Prioritize Threat Vectors to Accelerate
7 Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Market By Application (Page No. – 41)
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Configuration Management
7.2.1 Growing Demand for the Ability to Visualize the Threats and Vulnerabilities During Configuration
7.3 Patch Management
7.3.1 Need to Comply With Regulatory Frameworks and Focus on It Governance Policies Driving the Demand for Patch Management Application
7.4 Threat Intelligence
7.4.1 High Demand for Threat Intelligence and Mitigation Solutions to Create Remediation Strategy
7.5 Others
8 Market By End User (Page No. – 47)
8.1 Overview
8.2 Enterprise and Datacenters
8.3 Managed Service Providers
9 Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Market By Region (Page No. – 51)
9.1 Introduction
9.2 North America
9.2.1 United States
9.2.2 Canada
9.3 Europe
9.3.1 United Kingdom
9.3.2 Germany
9.3.3 France
9.3.4 Rest of Europe
9.4 Asia Pacific
9.4.1 China
9.4.2 Japan
9.4.3 India
9.4.4 Australia and New Zealand
9.4.5 Rest of Asia Pacific
9.5 Rest of the World
9.5.1 Middle East
9.5.2 Latin America
10 Competitive Landscape (Page No. – 65)
10.1 Competitive Leadership Mapping
10.1.1 Visionary Leaders
10.1.2 Innovators
10.1.3 Dynamic Differentiators
10.1.4 Emerging Companies
10.2 Strength of Product Portfolio (20 Players)
10.3 Business Strategy Excellence (20 Players)
10.4 Ranking of Key Players for the Automated Breach and Attack Simulation Market, 2019
11 Company Profiles (Page No. – 70)
11.1 Introduction
(Business Overview, Products Offered, Recent Developments, and MnM View)*
11.2 Qualys
11.3 Rapid7
11.4 DXC Technology
11.5 AttackIQ
11.6 Cymulate
11.7 XM Cyber
11.8 Skybox Security
11.9 SafeBreach
11.10 Firemon
11.11 Verodin (FireEye)
11.12 NopSec
11.13 Threatcare
11.14 Mazebolt
11.15 Scythe
11.16 Cronus Cyber Technologies
*Details on Business Overview, Products Offered, Recent Developments, and MnM View Might Not be Captured in Case of Unlisted Companies.
12 Appendix (Page No. – 94)
12.1 Discussion Guide
12.2 Knowledge Store: Marketsandmarkets’ Subscription Portal
12.3 Available Customization
12.4 Related Reports
12.5 Author Details