ネットワーク中立性に関するグローバルベンチマーク...市場調査レポートについてご紹介

※調査レポートサンプル

http://h-and-i.main.jp/market-report/IDATE/M14116MRA.pdf

1. Executive Summary 9
2. Methodology & definitions … 13
2.1. General methodology of IDATE’s reports 13
2.2. What is Net Neutrality? . 14
3. Status of Net neutrality around the world 15
3.1. Overall view … 15
3.2. Summary of wireline telcos … 19
3.3. Summary of mobile telcos . 21
3.4. Summary of regulation . 23
3.5. Summary of content and service providers . 25
3.6. Evolution of net neutrality; a review of 2013 … 26
4. Australia . 28
4.1. Wireline telcos … 28
4.1.1. Technical measures employed . 28
4.1.2. Statements .. 29
4.1.3. Broadband network (NBN) … 30
4.2. Mobile telcos.. 31
4.2.1. Differentiation measures . 31
4.2.2. Statements .. 31
4.3. Regulation .. 31
4.4. Content and service providers .. 33
5. Canada … 35
5.1. Wireline telcos … 35
5.1.1. Technical measures employed . 35
5.1.2. Change in policy, from throttling to non-throttling . 36
5.1.3. Statements .. 38
5.2. Mobile telcos.. 40
5.2.1. Differentiation measures . 40
5.2.2. Statements .. 40
5.3. Regulation .. 40
5.3.1. Initiatives from the regulator (CRTC) 40
5.3.2. Parliamentary initiatives .. 42
5.3.3. Legal cases . 43
5.4. Content and service providers .. 44
5.4.1. Google introduces “Video Quality Report” 44
5.4.2. The players’ positions with respect to Net neutrality. 45

6. The United States .. 46
6.1. Wireline telcos … 46
6.1.1. Technical measures employed . 46
6.1.2. Statements .. 50
6.1.3. Piracy in the United States … 53
6.2. Mobile telcos.. 54
6.2.1. Differentiation measures . 54
6.2.2. Statements .. 57
6.3. Regulation .. 58
6.3.1. Initiatives from the regulator (FCC) .. 58
6.3.2. Bills .. 60
6.3.3. 700 MHz spectrum .. 60
6.3.4. President Obama’s position . 61
6.3.5. Legal cases . 61
6.4. Content and service providers .. 64
7. Europe 67
7.1. Regulation .. 67
7.2. CEO Roundtable proposals … 70
7.3. Slovenia and the Czech Republic . 71
8. France 72
8.1. Wireline telcos … 72
8.1.1. Technical measures employed . 72
8.1.2. DNS hijacking .. 73
8.1.3. The five French ISPs versus Google (YouTube) .. 75
8.1.4. Free blocks all Google ads … 75
8.1.5. Statements .. 75
8.2. Mobile telcos.. 77
8.2.1. Differentiation measures . 77
8.2.2. Statements .. 78
8.3. Regulation .. 79
8.3.1. Regulator (ARCEP) . 79
8.3.2. Draft legislation 80
8.3.3. Legal cases and proceedings … 82
8.4. Content and service providers .. 83
9. Germany 85
9.1. Wireline telcos … 85
9.1.1. Technical measures employed . 85
9.1.2. Statements .. 86
9.2. Mobile telcos.. 87
9.2.1. Differentiation measures . 87
9.2.2. Statements .. 88
9.3. Regulation .. 88
9.3.1. Position of the federal ministry of economics (BMWi) .. 88
9.3.2. The regulator’s position (BNetzA). 89
9.3.3. Other regulatory elements … 89
9.3.4. Legal cases . 90

10. Italy 93
10.1. Wireline telcos … 93
10.1.1. Technical measures employed . 93
10.1.2. Statements concerning Net neutrality … 94
10.2. Mobile telcos.. 95
10.2.1. Differentiation measures . 95
10.2.2. Statements .. 95
10.3. Regulation .. 96
10.3.1. The regulator’s position … 96
10.3.2. Political positions . 97
10.3.3. Legal cases . 97
10.4. Content and service providers .. 99
11. The Netherlands .. 100
11.1. Wireline telcos . 100
11.1.1. Technical measures employed … 100
11.1.2. Billing systems… 100
11.2. Mobile telcos 101
11.3. Regulation 102
11.4. Content and service providers 103
12. Norway . 104
12.1. Wireline telcos . 104
12.1.1. Technical measures employed … 104
12.1.2. The case of NextGenTel … 105
12.1.3. Statements 105
12.2. Mobile telcos 106
12.2.1. Differentiation measures … 106
12.2.2. Statements 106
12.3. Regulation 107
12.4. Service and content providers 108
13. Spain 109
13.1. Wireline telcos . 109
13.1.1. Technical measures employed … 109
13.1.2. Statements 109
13.1.3. Billing system 110
13.2. Mobile telcos 111
13.2.1. Differentiation measures … 111
13.2.2. Statements 111
13.3. Regulation 112
13.4. Content and service providers 113

14. The United Kingdom … 114
14.1. Wireline telcos . 114
14.1.1. Technical measures employed … 114
14.1.2. Virgin Media offering Netflix with no traffic management 116
14.1.3. Statements 117
14.2. Mobile telcos 118
14.2.1. Differentiation measures … 118
14.2.2. Traffic management .. 119
14.2.3. Statements 120
14.3. Regulation 122
14.3.1. The regulator’s position . 122
14.3.2. The government’s position . 125
14.3.3. Legal cases … 125
14.4. Content and service providers 126
15. Japan… 128
15.1. Wireline telcos . 128
15.1.1. Technical measures employed … 128
15.1.2. Statements 129
15.2. Mobile telcos 129
15.2.1. Differentiation measures … 129
15.2.2. Statements 131
15.3. Regulation 131
15.3.1. Introduction: ISP competition in Japan is deemed healthy . 131
15.3.2. The MIC Working Group on Net Neutrality . 132
15.3.3. Guidelines for packet shaping 132
15.3.4. Conclusion: no specific regulation, guidelines are sufficient … 133
15.3.5. Law enforcement on piracy 133
15.4. Content and service providers 134
16. South Korea . 135
16.1. Wireline telcos . 135
16.2. Mobile telcos 136
16.3. Regulation 137
16.4. Content and service providers 138

Tables & Figures

Table 1: Synthesis of the Net neutrality debate relating to fixed networks . 17
Table 2: Synthesis of the Net neutrality debate relating to mobile networks .. 18
Table 3: Differentiation practices on fixed networks … 20
Table 4: Differentiation practices on mobile networks 22
Table 5: Status of regulatory debates and policies 24
Table 6: Content and service providers’ positions with respect to Net neutrality … 26
Table 7: Excerpt from CRTC’s 2012-15 work plan . 42
Table 8: Dissatisfaction of users by ISP and service (% of respondents) .. 82
Table 9: ISP Get: flat rate plans segmented by connection speed .. 104
Table 10: Recap of data plan prices as of February 2010 . 112
Table 11: Allowable use of the word “unlimited” according to Ofcom 124
***
Figure 1: The key Net neutrality issues along the video distribution value chain 10
Figure 2: New sources of income for telcos 12
Figure 3: Classes of service proposed for Australia’s NBN . 30
Figure 4: List of ISPs who offer unmetered access to ABC iview service … 34
Figure 5: Rogers’ traffic management policy (current, after CTRC intervention in 2012) 36
Figure 6: Rogers’ traffic management policy (before CTRC intervention in 2012) .. 37
Figure 7: Bell Canada’s traffic management policy (before CTRC intervention in 2012) 37
Figure 8: Bell Canada’s traffic management policy (current, after CTRC intervention in 2012) .. 38
Figure 9: CRTC letter to Rogers (Jan. 20, 2012) 43
Figure 10: Google’s Video Quality Report launched in Janaury 2014 … 44
Figure 11: Evolution of download throughput of select ISPs over time . 48
Figure 12: Netflix performance in the United States according to customers’ ISP 50
Figure 13: Mozilla landing page during protest . 53
Figure 14: Restrictions applied within the European Union … 69
Figure 15: BEREC work on net neutrality . 70
Figure 16: Enablers identified by WG1 . 71
Figure 17: Illustration of DNS hijacking by Orange … 73
Figure 18: Message displayed on 12/01/2011 on the screens of Orange customers trying to connect to Megavideo74
Figure 19: Proposals contained in the Economic Affairs Committee report .. 81
Figure 20: TeleTu information on quality of service .. 98
Figure 21: Alice’s current information on quality of service … 98
Figure 22: Internet access plans priced by connection speed 101
Figure 23: Regulation in the Netherlands 103
Figure 24: Reasonable traffic management criteria 108
Figure 25: ONO’s service bundles .. 110
Figure 26: Yoigo’s VoIP add-on “Bono Voz IP”, and the La Infinita 35 tariff which already includes this VoIP option111
Figure 27: Ofcom presentation on Net neutrality (2006) . 122
Figure 28: Degrees of traffic management .. 123
Figure 29: au smart pass, video pass, book pass and song pass … 131